FirstMoveFRI 23 OCT 2026
TODAYWORLDMARKETSAIAI SKILLSSPORT
First Move  ·  USII Daily  · 
Around the world — Friday morning, 23 October · War day 238

White House Affirms No Strikes Before Midterms; Iran Threatens New Retaliation Amid Regional Tensions

Washington confirms no military action against Iran before November 3rd, while Tehran reiterates readiness for both diplomacy and broader conflict.

ShareWhatsAppXLinkedIn

What happened, yesterday

The story

As November 3rd's US midterm elections draw near, the White House has explicitly stated that the United States will not initiate attacks on Iran before the vote. This clarification comes amidst reports of advanced US and Israeli planning for renewed military strikes on Iran, with one Israeli source remarking that "hunting season is open as soon as the elections end." These plans reportedly target Iran's nuclear facilities, energy infrastructure, and missile and drone arsenals. Meanwhile, Tehran maintains its defiant posture, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi declaring Iran's readiness for both diplomatic solutions and continued conflict. The diplomatic track, however, remains largely stalled, particularly concerning Iran's enriched uranium stockpile. The current lull appears to be a politically driven pause, with a potential for significant escalation immediately following the US elections, which could reshape the conflict's trajectory. The ongoing military buildup in the region by the US underscores the seriousness of these preparations.

Who moved today

ActorWhat changedConsequence
USWhite House spokesperson Anna Kelly confirmed the US will not attack Iran before the November 3rd midterm elections.This indicates a temporary restraint on military action, likely for political stability.
IranForeign Minister Abbas Araghchi reiterated Iran's preparedness for both diplomacy and war.This signals Tehran's dual strategy of maintaining open channels while projecting military readiness.
IranMajor General Mohsen Rezaei, Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, stated Iran has not yet deployed all its military capabilities and seeks terms to prevent further aggression.This suggests a warning of untapped retaliatory potential and a desire to negotiate an end to the conflict on its terms.
USTreasury Secretary Scott Bessent presented evidence, including satellite imagery of Kharg Island, claiming 'Operation Economic Outcast' is successfully cutting off Iran's oil lifeline.This highlights Washington's continued focus on economic pressure as a key tool in the conflict.

Three ways this might unfold

A negotiated settlement emerges on nuclear limits and regional security. ~15%

If the US and Iran find common ground on uranium enrichment and sanctions relief.

  • Sanctions on Iranian oil exports would likely ease, increasing global supply.
  • Naval blockades in the Strait of Hormuz could be lifted, stabilizing shipping.
  • Regional proxies might reduce kinetic actions, lowering overall tensions.
  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspections in Iran would likely expand.
  • US military posture in the Gulf might be re-evaluated for de-escalation.
  • Regional diplomatic engagement, possibly involving Gulf states, would increase.

US and Israel launch renewed strikes, triggering Iranian retaliation. ~60%

If President Trump approves military action after the US midterm elections.

  • Iran would likely target regional oil infrastructure and shipping in retaliation.
  • Cyberattacks against critical infrastructure in the Gulf could intensify.
  • US forces in the region would face increased threats from Iranian proxies.
  • Calls for an emergency UN Security Council meeting would immediately follow.
  • Global energy prices would likely surge further due to supply fears.
  • Israel's air defense systems would be on high alert for missile and drone attacks.
  • Evacuation advisories for diplomatic staff and expatriates in the Gulf would be issued.

Current tensions persist with limited kinetic exchanges and stalled diplomacy. ~25%

If neither side initiates a major offensive and diplomatic impasses continue.

  • Periodic, localized clashes in the Strait of Hormuz would continue.
  • Economic sanctions on Iran would remain in place, slowly eroding its economy.
  • Iran would continue its uranium enrichment program, inching closer to higher purity.
  • US military presence in the Gulf would remain elevated as a deterrent.
  • Proxy forces in Yemen and Lebanon would maintain low-level hostilities.
  • International mediation efforts would persist but yield no immediate breakthroughs.

Threads worth pulling

What others are saying

Carnegie Endowment (Karim Sadjadpour). Iran's campaign against Israel has inflicted more suffering on Palestinians, Arabs, and Iranians than on Israelis, and has primarily benefited the Israeli right.

Stimson Center (Barbara Slavin). The United States and Iran have moved perilously close to direct clashes due to the escalating war in the Middle East.

MIT Security Studies Program (Jim Walsh). The strategic and military implications of the US amassing forces in the region ahead of a possible attack on Iran after the elections are significant.

What we’ll be watching

Markets, FX, reserves: fmd-data (). News + analyst voices: grounded via Google Search at publish time.