FirstMoveSAT 01 AUG 2026
TODAYWORLDMARKETSAIAI SKILLSSPORT
First Move  ·  USII Daily  · 
Around the world — Saturday morning, 01 August · War day 155

US and Israel Plan Major Strikes on Iran Energy Sites; Tanker Hit Off Oman

The United States and Israel are reportedly planning extensive bombing operations against Iran's energy infrastructure this weekend, as a tanker was struck by an unknown projectile off Oman.

ShareWhatsAppXLinkedIn

What happened, yesterday

The story

The Middle East faces a potential surge in conflict as reports indicate the United States and Israel are preparing for a major bombing campaign targeting Iran's energy infrastructure this weekend. Discussions regarding these extensive strikes, which could include power plants and oil refineries, reportedly took place during a Cabinet meeting President Donald Trump held at Camp David. While sources indicate Israel has been briefed and is coordinating with the US, an Israeli official stated they are unaware of a decision to restart full military operations. The planned offensive comes amid a warning from Iran that US-related facilities in the Middle East could become targets for retaliation if attacks materialize. Adding to the escalating tensions, a tanker off the coast of Oman reported being struck by an "unknown projectile" on Saturday, causing damage to its engine room. The timing of the potential strikes has been a point of discussion, with some consideration given to concluding operations before financial markets open on Monday due to concerns about global economic impact.

Who moved today

ActorWhat changedConsequence
USMultiple sources reported that the US is planning extensive bombing operations against Iran's energy infrastructure this weekend.This signals a significant escalation in military pressure on Iran, with potential for widespread regional and economic repercussions.
IsraelReports suggest Israel is coordinating with the US on planned strikes against Iran's energy infrastructure, though an Israeli official denied awareness of a decision to restart full military operations.A joint operation would mark Israel's return to combat operations, which had been halted during a US-brokered truce.
IranA tanker was struck by an "unknown projectile" off the coast of Oman, causing damage to its engine room.This incident adds to maritime security concerns in a critical shipping lane, amidst heightened tensions with the US and Israel.

Three ways this might unfold

A diplomatic breakthrough leads to a de-escalation of military actions. ~15%

If the planned strikes are called off and a new, verifiable truce is quickly established, perhaps through renewed mediation efforts:

  • Direct diplomatic channels between the US and Iran would likely reopen, focusing on a lasting peace agreement.
  • Israel might pause further military operations, adhering to a broader ceasefire.
  • International calls for restraint would intensify, potentially with G20 nations urging dialogue.
  • The Strait of Hormuz would likely see reduced military activity, easing shipping concerns.
  • Focus would shift to longer-term nuclear negotiations, potentially involving the P5+1.

US and Israeli strikes on Iran's energy infrastructure trigger a wider regional conflict. ~60%

If the US and Israel proceed with the reported bombing campaign against Iran's energy infrastructure this weekend:

  • Iran would likely retaliate with strikes on US-related facilities in the Middle East, as warned.
  • The Strait of Hormuz could face further disruptions and potential closures, impacting global trade.
  • Regional proxies supported by Iran may increase attacks on US and allied interests.
  • Cyberattacks targeting critical infrastructure in the region could escalate, following recent probes into Iranian hacking.
  • The conflict could draw in more regional actors, increasing the risk of a broader war.
  • International condemnation of military action would likely increase, alongside calls for immediate de-escalation.

The conflict continues with limited, targeted strikes and ongoing diplomatic uncertainty. ~25%

If the planned strikes are delayed, scaled back, or if initial strikes do not provoke immediate widespread retaliation:

  • Military actions would continue to be characterized by tit-for-tat exchanges without full-scale escalation.
  • Diplomatic efforts would remain stalled, with both sides maintaining firm positions.
  • The US naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz would likely persist, maintaining economic pressure.
  • Concerns about the impact on the global economy would remain, but without immediate severe shocks.
  • The possibility of a land blockade on Iran would continue to be explored as a non-kinetic option.

Threads worth pulling

What others are saying

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (Aaron David Miller). Aaron David Miller noted in July 2026 that negotiations are 'doubtful' when US service members are killed in Iran strikes, indicating a lack of urgency to end the war.

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (Alia Sajjadian, Andrew Leber). Alia Sajjadian and Andrew Leber highlighted in July 2026 that targeting energy infrastructure in the war with Iran has an outsized impact on civilians, strengthening the case for ethical limits.

The Soufan Center. The Soufan Center observed in July 2026 that the US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding did not reconcile rival strategic objectives, indicating no end to the conflict is in sight.

What we’ll be watching

Markets, FX, reserves: fmd-data (). News + analyst voices: grounded via Google Search at publish time.