First Move  ·  USII Daily  · 
Around the world โ€” Wednesday morning, 22 July ยท War day 145

Trump Threatens Natanz Strike as US Completes 11th Night of Attacks; Israel Braces

US Secretary Rubio expresses skepticism about Iran's commitment to talks, even as US strikes continue for an eleventh night and Pakistan mediates for de-escalation.

ShareWhatsAppXLinkedIn

What happened, yesterday

The story

The Middle East remains on edge as the United States completed its eleventh consecutive night of airstrikes against Iran, targeting military operations centers, maritime capabilities, and logistics infrastructure. Adding to the tension, President Trump intensified rhetoric by threatening "very heavy" strikes on the Pickaxe Mountain area near Iran's Natanz uranium enrichment facility. This development is particularly concerning as Israeli officials reportedly believe an expanded US campaign could prompt direct Iranian retaliation against Israel, leading to a six-hour security consultation by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Meanwhile, diplomatic efforts are struggling, with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressing skepticism about Iran's seriousness for talks, despite stating US willingness to negotiate. Iran's Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni met with Pakistani officials, seeking continued mediation to salvage the collapsed interim ceasefire. The ongoing conflict continues to disrupt vital shipping lanes, including the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea, impacting global energy supplies.

Who moved today

ActorWhat changedConsequence
USCompleted its 11th consecutive night of airstrikes against Iran, targeting military and logistics infrastructure.This continues the campaign to degrade Iran's ability to threaten shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.
US (President Trump)Threatened to strike the Pickaxe Mountain area near Iran's Natanz uranium enrichment facility "very heavily" and "pretty soon."This signals a potential significant escalation in the scope of US military action.
IranAttacked a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz, forcing its crew to abandon the vessel.This demonstrates Iran's continued intent to disrupt commercial shipping in key waterways.
IsraelHeld a six-hour security consultation with senior defense officials, assessing the situation as a broader US campaign could trigger Iranian retaliation.This indicates heightened alert and preparation for potential direct conflict.
PakistanHosted Iran's Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni for talks aimed at salvaging the interim ceasefire agreement.This signifies ongoing efforts by a key mediator to de-escalate the conflict through diplomacy.

Three ways this might unfold

A brokered ceasefire leads to renewed talks and a reduction in regional hostilities. ~15%

If Pakistan's mediation efforts gain traction and both the US and Iran show genuine commitment to de-escalation, a new agreement could emerge.

  • US and Iran would halt direct military engagements.
  • Iran would cease attacks on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea.
  • Sanctions relief or a return to the June MOU framework could be discussed.
  • Regional proxies might reduce their activities, lowering overall tensions.
  • Israel's immediate concerns about direct retaliation might lessen.
  • Global energy markets would likely see a significant calming effect.
  • Focus could shift back to broader nuclear program negotiations.
  • International trade routes would normalize, reducing shipping costs and delays.

US strikes Natanz, leading to direct Iranian retaliation against Israel and broader regional conflict. ~45%

If President Trump follows through on his threat to strike the Natanz facility and Iran retaliates directly against Israel, the conflict would widen.

  • Iran would likely launch missiles or drones directly at Israeli targets.
  • Israel would respond with a full-force military operation against Iran.
  • US military involvement could expand beyond current airstrikes.
  • Shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea would face severe disruption or closure.
  • Regional allies of both sides could be drawn into direct conflict.
  • Humanitarian crisis in the region would worsen, with increased casualties.
  • Diplomatic efforts would likely collapse entirely.
  • Oil prices would surge dramatically, potentially to unprecedented levels.

US and Iran continue tit-for-tat strikes, maintaining a volatile status quo without full-scale war. ~40%

If both the US and Iran continue their current patterns of strikes and retaliations without crossing major red lines, the conflict will remain contained but active.

  • US airstrikes against Iranian military targets would persist.
  • Iran would continue targeting commercial shipping and US-allied facilities in the region.
  • Diplomatic efforts would remain stalled or achieve only minor, temporary ceasefires.
  • Israel would maintain a heightened state of alert but avoid direct engagement unless attacked.
  • The Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea would remain high-risk zones for shipping.
  • Regional economies, particularly energy importers, would continue to face uncertainty.
  • Casualties among US troops and Iranian civilians would continue to climb.
  • The potential for miscalculation leading to escalation would remain high.

Around the world

CountryWhat changedDeduction
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USCompleted its 11th night of airstrikes against Iran, targeting military infrastructure.The US maintains its military pressure campaign to degrade Iranian capabilities and secure maritime routes.
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ PakistanHosted Iran's Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni for mediation talks.Pakistan is actively attempting to facilitate de-escalation and revive diplomatic solutions to the conflict.
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ IndiaContinues to be highly vulnerable to oil price increases due to its high import dependence.India's economy faces significant macroeconomic risks, including lower GDP growth and higher inflation, if oil prices remain elevated.
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi ArabiaIts oil tankers rerouted in the Red Sea due to Houthi threats, impacting its alternative export routes.Saudi Arabia faces increased vulnerability to shipping disruptions, potentially impacting its oil exports even via alternative routes.
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ European UnionMajor European economies are net energy importers, facing potential stagnation in GDP growth and increased inflation if oil prices rise significantly.European economies remain exposed to the energy price shocks caused by the conflict, though less reliant on Gulf oil than some Asian nations.

Threads worth pulling

What others are saying

Carnegie Endowment (Aaron David Miller). Israel has no interest in joining the contained confrontation between Iran and the United States โ€” the current situation is the best one for us.

Carnegie Endowment (Nicole Grajewski). Iran has been debating whether to cross the nuclear weapons threshold, which would complicate efforts to defuse tensions with Israel or improve ties with the next US president.

The Soufan Center. To the frustration of U.S., regional, and global officials, the June U.S.-Iran Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) did not reconcile or satisfy the rival strategic objectives.

Middle East Institute (Fatemeh Aman). The United States and Iran have moved 'perilously close to direct clashes' as a result of the escalating war in the Middle East and US efforts to defend Israel.

What weโ€™ll be watching

Markets, FX, reserves: fmd-data (). News + analyst voices: grounded via Google Search at publish time.