First Move  ·  USII Daily  · 
Around the world โ€” Thursday morning, 16 July ยท War day 139

US Intensifies Iran Strikes, Tehran Retaliates with Jordan Drone Attack as Diplomacy Crumbles

US forces launched further strikes on Iran, which responded with drone attacks on US military sites in Jordan, as the Strait of Hormuz blockade continues.

ShareWhatsAppXLinkedIn

What happened, yesterday

The story

The Middle East remains a flashpoint as military exchanges between the United States and Iran intensify, pushing diplomacy further out of reach. American forces executed multiple waves of strikes on Iranian military infrastructure, targeting command centers, air defense sites, missile and drone capabilities, and coastal surveillance facilities, particularly in Bandar Abbas and on Greater Tunb Island. In a direct response, Iran launched drone attacks against US military facilities located in Jordan, broadening the geographic scope of the conflict. Simultaneously, the US has reimposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports, aiming to curb Iran's ability to interfere with commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran's Revolutionary Guard quickly countered, threatening to halt all energy exports from the Middle East if the blockade persists. Diplomatic efforts, including a previously established Memorandum of Understanding, are widely seen as having collapsed, with Tehran declaring US actions have made negotiations pointless. Adding to the tensions, President Trump has warned of potential strikes against Iranian energy targets and bridges in the coming days. This cycle indicates a deepening military confrontation with little immediate prospect for de-escalation.

Who moved today

ActorWhat changedConsequence
USLaunched multiple waves of strikes against Iranian military targets, including command centers, air defense sites, and coastal surveillance facilities.Further escalated military action and aimed to degrade Iran's naval and air defense capabilities.
IranLaunched drone attacks against US military facilities in Jordan.Signaled a direct retaliation against US assets in the region, broadening the scope of targets.
Iran's Revolutionary GuardThreatened to halt all Middle East energy exports over the US naval blockade.Heightened concerns over global energy supply and further weaponized the Strait of Hormuz issue.
President TrumpReiterated threats to strike Iranian energy targets and bridges next week.Signaled a potential expansion of US targets beyond military infrastructure.

Three ways this might unfold

A broad diplomatic deal is reached, leading to a de-escalation of military actions. ~15%

If the US and Iran agree to a renewed ceasefire, comprehensive nuclear inspections, and lifting of key sanctions.

  • Direct military confrontations would cease across the region.
  • The naval blockade on Iranian ports would be lifted, restoring freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz.
  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors would gain full access to Iranian nuclear facilities.
  • Regional proxy conflicts would likely see a reduction in support from Iran.
  • Previously stalled negotiations between Israel and Lebanon could resume with renewed impetus.
  • Statements from both Washington and Tehran would shift towards reconciliation and mutual commitments.

Military escalation continues with expanded targets and regional involvement. ~65%

If US and Iranian forces continue tit-for-tat strikes, and Iran expands its regional retaliation.

  • US strikes could target Iranian energy infrastructure, as threatened by President Trump.
  • Iran could attempt to fully close the Strait of Hormuz, severely disrupting global shipping.
  • Further Iranian retaliatory attacks on US military sites and regional allies are likely.
  • The risk of other regional actors being drawn directly into the conflict would increase.
  • Diplomatic channels would remain largely frozen, with both sides rejecting negotiation.
  • Increased military presence and readiness would be observed across the Persian Gulf.
  • Statements from both sides would emphasize resolve and military strength.

The conflict settles into a prolonged, active, but contained military confrontation. ~20%

If both sides continue military actions at current levels without significant expansion of targets or direct regional intervention.

  • US would maintain the naval blockade and continue targeted strikes against military assets.
  • Iran would persist with limited retaliatory actions, avoiding major escalation beyond current scope.
  • The Strait of Hormuz would remain partially disrupted, with ongoing efforts to enforce/circumvent the blockade.
  • Diplomatic efforts would remain stalled, with no breakthroughs in negotiations.
  • Regional allies would continue to bolster defenses but avoid direct military engagement.
  • The focus would remain on degrading military capabilities rather than broad economic or civilian targets.
  • International bodies would issue repeated calls for de-escalation without significant impact.

Around the world

CountryWhat changedDeduction
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United KingdomDesignated Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) under new National Security (State Threats) Act 2026.This action signals a hardening stance against Iran's state-sponsored entities and their regional activities.

Threads worth pulling

What others are saying

The Soufan Center. Tehran will likely continue to cultivate a network of proxy groups, including terrorist organizations and criminal entities, irrespective of any deal to end the US-Israeli war against Iran.

Carnegie Endowment (Aaron David Miller, Alan Eyre). The path ahead for US-Iran negotiations is fraught with challenges, as discussions continue on the implementation of any potential deal.

What weโ€™ll be watching

Markets, FX, reserves: fmd-data (). News + analyst voices: grounded via Google Search at publish time.