First Move  ·  USII Daily  · 
Around the world β€” Sunday morning, 12 July Β· War day 135

US and Iran Exchange Strikes; Tehran Closes Hormuz Again Amid Intensified Diplomacy

The US and Iran traded fresh strikes as Tehran again closed the Strait of Hormuz, while mediators in Oman continue efforts to salvage diplomatic solutions.

ShareWhatsAppXLinkedIn

What happened, yesterday

The story

The Middle East saw a renewed surge in military activity as the United States and Iran exchanged fresh strikes early Sunday. Tehran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) attacked the M/V GFS Galaxy, a commercial vessel in the Strait of Hormuz, and subsequently declared the critical waterway closed. This action prompted a third round of US retaliatory strikes, with the Pentagon stating it aims to degrade Iran's ability to attack commercial shipping. In response, Iran claimed to have struck a US air base in Qatar and a command center in Jordan. The escalation follows an exchange of rhetoric, including President Trump's threat of "decimation" if Iran attempts to assassinate him, and Iran's new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei vowing revenge for his father's death. Amidst this, diplomatic efforts continue, with Oman hosting talks between Iranian and Omani foreign ministers to discuss safe passage through the Strait. The fragile interim agreement appears severely tested, highlighting the persistent tension between military actions and ongoing attempts at de-escalation.

Who moved today

ActorWhat changedConsequence
USLaunched a third round of strikes against Iran, targeting missile, drone, and naval capabilities.This action aims to degrade Iran's military infrastructure but further escalates direct military confrontation with Tehran.
IranStruck a commercial vessel in the Strait of Hormuz, declared the strait closed, and attacked US bases in Qatar and Jordan.These actions directly challenge international shipping and US regional presence, raising the risk of broader conflict.
OmanContinued to host diplomatic discussions with Iranian officials regarding safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz.Oman maintains its role as a key mediator, providing a crucial channel for de-escalation amidst heightened tensions.
IsraelConducted an airstrike in southern Lebanon targeting alleged Hezbollah operatives.This move keeps pressure on Iranian-backed proxies and highlights the interconnectedness of regional conflicts.
United Arab EmiratesIts air defense systems responded to incoming missile and drone attacks attributed to Iran.The UAE directly experienced the impact of Iran's retaliatory actions, underscoring the regional spread of the conflict.

Three ways this might unfold

A diplomatic breakthrough leads to a new, more robust agreement on regional security and nuclear oversight. ~20%

If ongoing mediation efforts in Oman and other channels yield a concrete, verifiable agreement on the Strait of Hormuz and Iran's nuclear program, coupled with a commitment to de-escalation by all parties,

  • Military activity in the Gulf would significantly decrease, leading to a de-facto ceasefire.
  • International sanctions on Iran, particularly oil waivers, could see substantial adjustments.
  • The Strait of Hormuz would reopen for unrestricted international shipping, stabilizing global trade routes.
  • Regional stability would improve, potentially leading to renewed economic cooperation among Gulf states.
  • The focus would shift towards verifying Iran's nuclear commitments and implementing regional confidence-building measures.
  • Oil prices would likely experience a notable decline as supply concerns ease.

A direct military confrontation between the US and Iran, potentially involving regional allies, erupts into a full-scale conflict. ~45%

If Iran continues its aggressive actions in the Strait of Hormuz and targets US or allied assets, and the US responds with further significant, sustained military strikes,

  • The Strait of Hormuz would face a prolonged and complete closure, severely disrupting global oil and gas supplies.
  • Widespread military engagements across the Gulf and potentially into Iranian territory would become likely.
  • Regional proxies would activate, leading to increased attacks on Israel and Gulf states.
  • Cyber warfare capabilities would be fully deployed by all involved parties, impacting critical infrastructure.
  • International diplomatic efforts would shift from mediation to crisis management and humanitarian aid.
  • A significant increase in defense spending across the region and among major powers would occur.
  • There would be a mass exodus of foreign nationals from affected Middle Eastern countries.

A volatile status quo persists, characterized by intermittent strikes, diplomatic posturing, and localized skirmishes without major escalation or de-escalation. ~35%

If both sides continue tit-for-tat military actions and strong rhetoric, while maintaining back-channel diplomatic engagement that yields no decisive breakthrough or breakdown,

  • Shipping in the Strait of Hormuz would remain vulnerable to intermittent disruptions and increased insurance costs.
  • US military presence in the region would stay elevated, conducting defensive and retaliatory operations.
  • Iran would continue its nuclear program, possibly pushing enrichment levels, while denying weaponization intent.
  • Regional proxies like Hezbollah would maintain a state of readiness, engaging in periodic skirmishes.
  • Diplomatic efforts would remain stalled, with mediators struggling to achieve concrete progress.
  • Economic uncertainty would persist, impacting investment and trade flows in the broader Middle East.
  • The risk of miscalculation leading to accidental escalation would remain high.

Around the world

CountryWhat changedDeduction
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United StatesLaunched a third round of strikes against Iran in retaliation for attacks on commercial shipping.Reaffirms its commitment to protecting international maritime routes and degrading Iran's offensive capabilities.
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ QatarAn Iranian ballistic missile strike reportedly targeted the US air base at Al Udeid, destroying a fighter jet maintenance center and command facility.The nation's territory, housing a significant US military presence, became a direct target in the escalating US-Iran conflict.
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ United Arab EmiratesIts air defense systems responded to missile and drone attacks launched by Iran.Experiences direct threats from Iranian retaliation, underscoring the broader regional impact of the conflict.
πŸ‡―πŸ‡΄ JordanIran's IRGC claimed to have struck a US command and control center and drone hangars at Prince Hassan Air Base.Becomes a site of direct Iranian targeting of US military interests, broadening the geographical scope of attacks.

Threads worth pulling

What others are saying

Carnegie Endowment (Aaron David Miller). The ongoing peace talks between the United States and Iran are creating a strain on the relationship between Washington and Israel.

Soufan Center. The path to peace between the U.S. and Iran is obstructed by 'minefields,' and despite a ceasefire being tested, challenges persist in the Strait of Hormuz.

Stimson Center (Olli Heinonen). The conflict has expanded beyond initial Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, now involving attacks on civilian infrastructure and significant retaliatory responses from Iran.

RBC Capital Markets (Helima Croft). Iran's diplomatic signals often conflict with its military actions, and the IRGC maintains a firm grip on the Strait of Hormuz amidst regional escalation.

What we’ll be watching

Markets, FX, reserves: fmd-data (). News + analyst voices: grounded via Google Search at publish time.